Global What?
Our mission is to educate the public on the positive effects of additional atmospheric CO2 and help prevent the inadvertent negative impact to human, plant and animal life if we reduce CO2
 
Home
 
    
Why CO2 is Good
 
    
Climate Change
 
    
Politics are Not Green
 
    
News & Media
 
    
Stay Informed
 
    
About Us
 
    
 
 
In the news
  Posted on: Tuesday, May 1, 2012
Print  Print     Email  Email    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
  Facebook   Share link on Twitter Tweet  
Global What?
Source: One News Now

Climate change 'deniers' not so dumb after all

The current environmental paradigm assumes that those who don't believe in man-made climate change are less scientifically savvy, while those who do are scientifically smarter.

According to one study, however, those assumptions just aren't true.

"Seeming public apathy over climate change is often attributed to a deficit in comprehension. The public knows too little science, it is claimed, to understand the evidence or avoid being misled," said a report published in May in the journal Nature Climate Change. The study added: "We conducted a study to test this account and found no support for it."

Instead, the researchers found just the opposite: Those with the highest degrees of scientific understanding were less concerned about climate change, while those who were the most concerned scored slightly lower on tests of scientific knowledge.

"As respondents' science literacy scores increased, their concern with climate change decreased," the paper said.

Rather than scientific literacy, the researchers said it was ideology that was driving the cultural battle over man-made climate change. Those who believed in individual interests were less concerned about climate change and its causes, while those who believed in pushing for social equality were more concerned.

The study was funded by the National Science Foundation.
          www.nature.com, 5/27/12; www.foxnews.com, 5/28/12

Post a comment
Name/Nickname:
(required)
Email Address: (must be a valid address)
(will not be published or shared)
Comments: (plain text only)
 
Recent Articles:
5/1/12   Global What?
4/27/12   EPA’S Toxic Science
4/20/12   For Wheat and Rice, CO2 is Nice
4/10/12   Former NASA scientists, astronauts admonish agency on climate change position
4/10/12   Former NASA Scientists and Astronauts Blast Agency for Disregarding Climate Change Evidence
3/29/12   Acclimation to Ocean Acidification: Give It Some Time
3/26/12   Is this finally proof we're NOT causing global warming?
3/22/12   Tropical Forests Rejoice!
2/27/12   Bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster, and High Climate Sensitivity
2/21/12   Concerned Scientists Reply on Global Warming
2/17/12   STEWARD: Voodoo Environomics
2/15/12   Flowers Love CO2
2/6/12   The Sun: O Inconstant Star!
1/29/12   Forget global warming - it's Cycle 25 we need to worry about (and if NASA scientists are right the Thames will be freezing over again)
1/27/12   No Need to Panic About Global Warming
1/25/12   Dr. David Evans: The Skeptic's Case
1/10/12   Will Replicated Global Warming Science Make Mann Go Ape?
1/7/12   Taking Fears of Acid Oceans With a Grain of Salt
1/3/12   Antarctic Temperature Trends
5/26/11   No Long-term Trend in Atlantic Hurricane Numbers
9/1/10   Meltdown of the climate 'consensus'
5/21/10   Prominent Princeton Scientist Dr. Happer Testifies to Congress
11/4/09   Plants need more CO2, not less
8/28/09   Utah governor says climate change debate not over
8/13/09   Earth’s Warming Rate Overestimated
Search Archives:
Print  Print    Email  Email    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
  Facebook   Share link on Twitter Tweet  

** For additional peer-reviewed scientific references and an in-depth discussion of the science supporting our position, please visit Climate Change Reconsidered: The Report of the Nongovernmental Planel on Climate Change (www.climatechangereconsidered.org), or CO2 Science (www.co2science.org).