Leighton Steward: Obama's Fuel Efficiency Plan Is 'Bad News'
Our mission is to educate the public on the positive effects of additional atmospheric CO2 and help prevent the inadvertent negative impact to human, plant and animal life if we reduce CO2
 
Home
 
    
Why CO2 is Good
 
    
Climate Change
 
    
Politics are Not Green
 
    
News & Media
 
    
Stay Informed
 
    
About Us
 
    
 
 
In the news
  Posted on: Monday, June 16, 2014
Print  Print     Email  Email    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
  Facebook   Share link on Twitter Tweet   Shared 2 times
Leighton Steward: Obama's Fuel Efficiency Plan Is 'Bad News'

President Barack Obama's plan to tighten fuel efficiency for medium- and heavy-duty trucks is not good for the nation, says Leighton Steward, chairman of Plants Need C02.

"It's bad news . . . What they're putting out here is essentially going to stop the development of any new coal plants," Steward told Joe Concha, guest host of "The Steve Malzberg Show" on Newsmax TV.

"As soon as they get that done, everybody figures they'll go ahead and move in and put these same regulations on existing coal plants and just put the coal people out of business," he said Tuesday.

Story continues below video.

 


Steward, whose non-profit group touts the positive effects of additional atmospheric CO2, says Obama's use of executive authority to address climate change echoes one of his notorious campaign promises.

"He said I am going to bankrupt the coal industry and energy prices will necessarily skyrocket. He said that. It's on tape. It's public," Steward said.

"So, it looks to me like he's just trying to follow through with that instead of going through the Congress . . . He's just going to do it by executive fiat and tell the EPA to get it done."

Americans can expect the tighter regulations to raise the price of energy, Steward says.

"[That] will effect everything – utility bills and food supplies and transportation . . . and it's going to hurt the poor people the most because they're the ones that don't have any optional dollars to spend."


Click here for the full article
Post a comment
Name/Nickname:
(required)
Email Address: (must be a valid address)
(will not be published or shared)
Comments: (plain text only)
 
Recent Articles:
6/16/14   Leighton Steward: Obama's Fuel Efficiency Plan Is 'Bad News'
2/25/14   Greenpeace Co-Founder Tells U.S. Senate Earth’s Geologic History ‘fundamentally contradicts’ CO2 Climate Fears
2/19/14   Breaking News
5/8/13   Harrison H. Schmitt and William Happer: In Defense of Carbon Dioxide
9/26/12   More Evidence Against a Methane Time Bomb
9/10/12   Sea Level Acceleration: Not so Fast
8/14/12   Hansen Is Wrong
7/24/12   Illiteracy at NASA
6/29/12   NRC Sea Level Rise Scare: Losing Sight of the Science
6/22/12   Not So Hot in East China
6/18/12   NASA Must Stop Global Warming Alarmism (570 News Radio)
6/4/12   Historical Imagery of Greenland Glaciers Lessens Sea Level Rise Alarm
5/18/12   CO2 Not to Blame for Southwest Droughts?
5/14/12   Future Southwest Drought in Doubt?
5/9/12   No sea level rise catastrophe?
5/3/12   Antarctica's ice is melting from warm water below
5/2/12   Plant life changes 'underestimated'
5/1/12   Global What?
4/27/12   EPA’S Toxic Science
4/20/12   For Wheat and Rice, CO2 is Nice
4/10/12   Former NASA scientists, astronauts admonish agency on climate change position
4/10/12   Former NASA Scientists and Astronauts Blast Agency for Disregarding Climate Change Evidence
3/29/12   Acclimation to Ocean Acidification: Give It Some Time
3/26/12   Is this finally proof we're NOT causing global warming?
3/22/12   Tropical Forests Rejoice!
   Next >>
Search Archives:
Print  Print    Email  Email    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
  Facebook   Share link on Twitter Tweet   Shared 2 times

** For additional peer-reviewed scientific references and an in-depth discussion of the science supporting our position, please visit Climate Change Reconsidered: The Report of the Nongovernmental Planel on Climate Change (www.climatechangereconsidered.org), or CO2 Science (www.co2science.org).