CO2 Not to Blame for Southwest Droughts?
Our mission is to educate the public on the positive effects of additional atmospheric CO2 and help prevent the inadvertent negative impact to human, plant and animal life if we reduce CO2
 
Home
 
    
Why CO2 is Good
 
    
Climate Change
 
    
Politics are Not Green
 
    
News & Media
 
    
Stay Informed
 
    
About Us
 
    
 
 
In the news
  Posted on: Friday, May 18, 2012
Print  Print     Email  Email    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
  Facebook   Share link on Twitter Tweet   Shared 1 times
CO2 Not to Blame for Southwest Droughts?
Source: World Climate Report

In our last WCR, we discussed a series of articles that found that higher resolution climate models-models which include a better representation of the complex terrain features of the Southwest-produce less drought stress on the Southwestern U.S. in their projections of future climate change from greenhouse gas emissions than do coarser resolution general circulation models.

Now comes along a new paper published in Nature magazine by Robert Allen and colleagues which suggests that the drying trend which remains is being caused more by black carbon aerosols and tropospheric ozone than by greenhouse gas emissions.

Recall that increased aridity in the Southwest is one of "robust" climate change projections for the U.S., at least according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The primary driver for the increased aridity is the projected northward expansion of the tropical belt component of the atmospheric circulation. This expansion of the tropics leads to a drying of subtropical regions such as the American Southwest as the preferred track for mid-latitude storm systems is shifted poleward.

Observations over the past 30 years or so show that the tropics have broadened by about 2 to 5 degrees latitude (a couple hundred miles) lending support to the climate model projections that the tropics will expand due to the continued build-up of atmospheric carbon dioxide. However, the observed rate of expansion far exceeds that projected to result from GHG increases. According to Allen et al. this may be the result of "relatively short observational record, the large natural variability of some expansion metrics, or model deficiencies." They set out to see if they could help identify the cause (spoiler alert: it turns out to be model deficiencies).
 
Their hunch was that other atmospheric warming agents (besides greenhouse gases)-specifically black carbon (soot) and tropospheric (low-level) ozone-may play a significant role.


Click here for the full article
Post a comment
Name/Nickname:
(required)
Email Address: (must be a valid address)
(will not be published or shared)
Comments: (plain text only)
 
Recent Articles:
5/18/12   CO2 Not to Blame for Southwest Droughts?
5/14/12   Future Southwest Drought in Doubt?
5/9/12   No sea level rise catastrophe?
5/3/12   Antarctica's ice is melting from warm water below
5/2/12   Plant life changes 'underestimated'
5/1/12   Global What?
4/27/12   EPA’S Toxic Science
4/20/12   For Wheat and Rice, CO2 is Nice
4/10/12   Former NASA scientists, astronauts admonish agency on climate change position
4/10/12   Former NASA Scientists and Astronauts Blast Agency for Disregarding Climate Change Evidence
3/29/12   Acclimation to Ocean Acidification: Give It Some Time
3/26/12   Is this finally proof we're NOT causing global warming?
3/22/12   Tropical Forests Rejoice!
2/27/12   Bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster, and High Climate Sensitivity
2/21/12   Concerned Scientists Reply on Global Warming
2/17/12   STEWARD: Voodoo Environomics
2/15/12   Flowers Love CO2
2/6/12   The Sun: O Inconstant Star!
1/29/12   Forget global warming - it's Cycle 25 we need to worry about (and if NASA scientists are right the Thames will be freezing over again)
1/27/12   No Need to Panic About Global Warming
1/25/12   Dr. David Evans: The Skeptic's Case
1/10/12   Will Replicated Global Warming Science Make Mann Go Ape?
1/7/12   Taking Fears of Acid Oceans With a Grain of Salt
1/3/12   Antarctic Temperature Trends
5/26/11   No Long-term Trend in Atlantic Hurricane Numbers
Search Archives:
Print  Print    Email  Email    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
  Facebook   Share link on Twitter Tweet   Shared 1 times

** For additional peer-reviewed scientific references and an in-depth discussion of the science supporting our position, please visit Climate Change Reconsidered: The Report of the Nongovernmental Planel on Climate Change (www.climatechangereconsidered.org), or CO2 Science (www.co2science.org).
 
 
 
RELATED CONTENT




More Videos & Media ...


More CO2 Facts

Read a series of facts to dispell the myths that address the hysteria of too much carbon dioxide in our atmosphere

Read more >>

Myths

Plants need CO2 addresses the myth that purveyed the public dialog around CO2

Read more >>